首页>海外升学 > 英语学习


发布时间:2016-03-07 16:24:39

Association (CCA) openly criticized Apple Inc once again Last week, the CCA announced the "Analysis on Complaints Received by Nationwide Consumers Associations on the First Half of 2012, "


回顾前几年,傲慢的苹果公司再度被中国消费者协会点名批评。中国消费者协会发布的 《2012年上半年全国消协组织受理投诉情况分析》报告指出,尽管苹果在7月初更改了部分维修条款,但修改“解释模糊”、“意思含混”,有欺骗消费者之嫌。

The China Consumer 
Association (CCA) openly criticized Apple Inc. once again. Last week, the CCA announced the "Analysis on Complaints Received by Nationwide Consumers' Associations on the First Half of 2012," pointing out that the revised after-sales service clauses of Apple Inc. at the beginning of July still are ambiguous and suspected of cheating consumers.

One month ago, the CCA and the consumers' associations of six provinces and cities had jointly issued an "Opinions on Unfair Repair and Maintenance Clauses of Apple Inc.," asking the company to revise its overbearing clauses.


Obviously, the CCA's criticism is helpless to stop the arrogance and prejudice of Apple Inc., which still showed a posture that "I'm arrogant. What can you do about me?"


Apple Inc. ignored the CCA's criticism because it knew clearly the "underlying rules" in China. The CCA has not the law enforcement power and cannot replace consumers to take public interest litigation against Apple Inc. What they can do is to support the infringed consumers to sue or denounce the misconducts damaging consumer rights and interests through media outlets. However, the individual consumers are difficult to shake these transnational corporations such as Apple due to hard evidence collecting, high cost and time-consuming, though supported by consumers' associations.

Since the consumers' associations have no rights to sue on the overbearing maintenance clauses, supervision departments should undertake the responsibility. However, no supervision departments have taken action.


Are the "overbearing clauses" hardly detected? The clauses that state "refurbished parts can be used for maintenance, the damage caused by maintenance is only compensable by maintenance fees, the damage caused in transportation cannot be repaired free of charge and that failing to take the product on time will be seen as a waiver" have clearly violated China's Consumer Protection Law, Contract Law, Product Quality Law, Property Law and the three guarantees for repair, replacement or compensation of faulty product. Both netizens and consumers' associations can see it. Did not the supervision departments see it? Moreover, Apple Inc. openly uses the double standard on the after-sales repair. As the vice chairman of CCA had said, "Apple products use the 'common version' of maintenance clauses but use 'special items' in such countries as Japan, Australia and Britain. The Apple Inc. specially uses the special items to meet the legal standards of other countries."


Why it abides by the laws of other countries but ignores Chinese law and even establishes arrogant double standard? The financial statement of Apple Inc. in the third quarter of 2012 showed that the total corporate income reached up to 35 billion U.S. dollars as of June 30, with 5.7 billion U.S. dollars gained in China, an increase of 48 percent year-on-year. How can Apple Inc. despise the important "God?"


The conniving of supervision department resulted in the arrogance of Apple Inc., embodying lax law enforcement beneath superficially strict legislation. No any departments dare to give a ticket to Apple and some departments even vindicate the overbearing clauses. These connivances more encouraged arrogant behaviors of Apple Inc. in China.

  • 专业分析:华人学建筑的优势

  • 如何在英国留学申请文书中突出自己

  • 【留学日记】悠闲慢走在英国的时光

  • 贫民窟中“洗碗工”考上牛津大学

  • 感受莎翁戏剧长诗,重温文艺复兴文化盛宴

  • 迎奥运,伦敦充分利用一切空间

  • 当心圣诞前的诈骗

  • 英国大学传统毕业典礼仪式

  • 英国学生签证申请全攻略

  • 英伦趣闻:间谍特工频繁出没的伦敦地点